- What is the essential story behind the piece you created?
The story behind the piece is the essential aspects
of an art or design critique. I
had a packed PowerPoint that told the story of how to structure a critique, but
I realized that it would be counter-intuitive to show a presentation and
basically read off all aspects. So, I asked myself, what would the core issue
that my students face everyday. It became clear after that. Students do not like critiques because
they feel it is a reflection of them succeeding or failing. The objective is to not only tell the
students how to do structure a critique, but how to accept a critique. It’s not about them personally. It is about how something on the page
isn’t sitting right.
- What was your purpose in creating this piece of new media narrative? Do you feel you were successful in communicating your purpose?
It was a very simple way to portray the subject, but I think it got the point across
that constructive criticism is not about the creator. I had considered making it into an interview, but my subject
wasn’t too keen on that idea. I,
also, was not too keen on that idea.
I didn’t want the video to be boring. I wanted to engage the viewer,
even if it was portrayed in a comedic way. I think the length was short enough to get the point
across.
- Who was your audience? Do you feel you were successful in reaching your audience?
My audience would be professors and students, most
likely of the University demographic, but it may be for younger viewers as
well. I believe I was successful
as my point was succinct. I think
it was comedic enough that students would watch it for 3 minutes and get the
idea.
- Why did you use your particular approach to media production and media selection? Were you successful?
When I thought about my choice of media, I thought it
would be easier to get video. Then
I thought, maybe I should make it like a book or a comic strip. Who doesn’t like exaggerated
facial expressions or people reading stories?
Was I successful? Generally, I think I was. I will be self critical by saying I could tweak this or tweak
that. I did consider throwing in
artwork pieces, such as the Mona Lisa, but I didn’t want to critique someone
who was considered a Master. I,
also, did not want to critique someone who was deceased. People go on how, even
the Masters of art, were critiqued.
For us, that is after the fact, that we first knew them because they
were famous. Our students are very
much alive and they are not famous, so when they hear a critique, it can be
painful. I want the students to
know that it is not about them. It
is strictly about the art work.
- What did you learn during the process of crafting your media piece that you can use in creating future new media narrative?
The personal project was much easier in telling a
story than the professional project, in my opinion. My first thoughts were how was I to engage the audience when
I was basically writing them a “How-to” book on a subject. That is when I realized I had to change
my way of thinking. Everything can
become a story if you can find that basic human connection. For me, that
connection was telling the students that the story is not about them, it’s
about the work.
No comments:
Post a Comment